Metadata Knowledge Graph Explained: Key Components, Use Cases & Implementation in 2026

What are the key components of a metadata knowledge graph?

Permalink to “What are the key components of a metadata knowledge graph?” #

A metadata knowledge graph is built from multiple layers of metadata that are connected, enriched, and made navigable. Metadata is the raw material, but relationships and context are what turn it into a graph.

At its core, a metadata knowledge graph includes the following components.

Technical, governance, quality, operational, collaboration and usage metadata

Permalink to “Technical, governance, quality, operational, collaboration and usage metadata” #

This captures everything that describes how data exists, behaves, and is governed across the organization.

It includes:

• Technical metadata: Schema definitions, tables, columns, pipelines, and queries.
• Governance metadata: Policies, classifications, access rules, and ownership.
• Operational metadata: Freshness, reliability, incidents, and SLAs
• Quality metadata: Quality metrics, validations, and anomalies
• Usage metadata: Usage patterns, consumers, and access frequency
• Collaboration metadata: Human context such as ownership details, stewards, documentation, and discussions.

Together, these metadata types provide a complete view of both the data itself and how it is used and managed.

Relationships and lineage

Permalink to “Relationships and lineage” #

Metadata alone isn’t enough. You only get a graph once you start linking data assets to one another and defining relationships.

This includes upstream and downstream lineage, dependencies between pipelines and datasets, ownership links, and governance relationships across systems and domains.

These connections allow teams to trace data flows, understand impact, and navigate complex data ecosystems.

Provenance

Permalink to “Provenance” #

Provenance captures where data comes from and how it is created, transformed, and consumed over time.

It records source systems, transformations, processing logic, and the teams or tools involved at each step, providing transparency and trust in the data lifecycle.

Semantic layer (what data means)

Permalink to “Semantic layer (what data means)” #

Beyond structure and lineage, a metadata knowledge graph must capture meaning and intent. The semantic layer connects technical metadata to business meaning.

It uses shared vocabularies, taxonomies, and domain concepts to map technical terms to business definitions, ensuring consistency in how data is understood across teams. This is what allows analysts, engineers, and business users to speak the same language when searching for and using data.

Contextual enrichment (why data exists and how it’s used)

Permalink to “Contextual enrichment (why data exists and how it’s used)” #

The context layer goes beyond meaning to capture intent and usage. It connects data assets to domains, business processes, metrics, objectives, and decision-making workflows.

This enables trustworthy discovery, cross-domain alignment, and AI-ready understanding, so that humans and machines can interpret data the same way.

Graph data model

Permalink to “Graph data model” #

Finally, all of this metadata, context, and meaning gets combined into a graph data model that can be traversed easily for search, discovery, lineage, impact analysis, and governance.

Once this structure is in place, the metadata knowledge graph becomes a living system that reflects how data actually flows and is used across the organization.

---

---

What are the top use cases of a metadata knowledge graph?

Permalink to “What are the top use cases of a metadata knowledge graph?” #

The metadata knowledge graph turns scattered metadata into an operational intelligence layer that supports analytics, governance, and AI at scale.

Top use cases of a metadata knowledge graph include:

• Data search and discovery: Enable users to find data assets using semantic relationships, such as business concepts, domains, and usage context, rather than relying only on keywords or technical names.
• Data governance and compliance: Enable automated, end-to-end data lineage to trace data origins, understand transformations, and continuously track policy compliance across systems and domains.
• Data quality detection and impact analysis: Identify data quality issues early, analyze root causes, and assess downstream impact using lineage, dependencies, and quality metadata.
• Data observability and system health monitoring: Monitor pipelines and platforms using operational metadata such as freshness, reliability, incidents, and SLAs to prevent disruptions before they affect the business.
• End-to-end data flow visibility: Understand how data moves from source to consumption across the entire data ecosystem, supporting confident change management and faster troubleshooting.
• AI and LLM foundation (GraphRAG): Act as a knowledge base for Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG), allowing AI systems to understand data context, relationships, governance constraints, and organizational intent for more accurate analysis and decision-making.

---

What are the core benefits of a metadata knowledge graph?

Permalink to “What are the core benefits of a metadata knowledge graph?” #

A metadata knowledge graph solves the same problems that traditional data catalogs, data governance tools, and data quality tools have tried to solve. The key difference here is that it becomes the one place to drive the solutions to those problems.

A metadata knowledge graph offers the following benefits:

• A central metadata control plane: It unifies metadata by breaking down siloes and connecting all data systems. The foundation of this unification rests upon a metadata control plane, but more on that later.
• Greater trust in data: It increases trust in data by creating a platform for enabling consistent data asset ownership, certification, context across domains, teams, and business functions
• Better governance and compliance: It makes governance and compliance much more enforceable by making the associated policies, rules, classifications, and directives a reflection of the state of data instead of an out-of-date document
• Faster issue resolution: It plays a key role in identifying and helping fix issues by leveraging asset lineage and dependency graphs, especially by making sure the impact of any change can be traced accurately
• Support for advanced D&A and AI use cases: It lays the foundation for the more advanced and more impactful use cases, such as semantic and ontological search, in addition to the more traditional keyword-based or full-text search

But none of this actually works without the right metadata foundation. The ‘Garbage in, Garbage Out’ adage holds true here as much as it does for any other application.

Unfortunately, that’s one of the key challenges in enabling a metadata knowledge graph for an organization. Let’s understand why.

---

What are some of the challenges in building a metadata knowledge graph?

Permalink to “What are some of the challenges in building a metadata knowledge graph?” #

Conversations like these might sound familiar to data teams.

“Why can’t a report answering a business question be created?”

“Well, the data source hasn’t been integrated into our data lakehouse yet.”

“No, the data source is there, but maybe it’s not cataloged.”

Despite having functioning data warehouses, lakes, and lakehouses, it is possible not to have a proper metadata catalog with both technical and business context.

Even when the metadata is available, it’s quite likely lying around in some isolated system, and that’s far from ideal. So, if there’s no proper metadata foundation, how can something more complex be built on top of it? Even if you build it, it won’t be reliable, and it will falter.

Some other examples of these challenges in foundational metadata are:

• The non-existence of metadata extraction, maintenance, and usage standards, tools, and connectors.
• The inability to support real-time changes in data assets, i.e., not being able to get real-time metadata changes.
• The inability to support a range of data sources, targets, and other intermediate systems.
• The lack of support across the organization to make business processes data-driven and data processes metadata-driven.
• The lack of higher-order metadata that allows you to capture associations, lineage, provenance, and governance.

This, by no means, is an exhaustive list of challenges, but they are some of the key ones that organizations face.

Fortunately, there is a solution to all this, which is a unified metadata control plane. Such a control plane not only provides the infrastructure, standards, frameworks, and guardrails to store and manage metadata, but also comes with the right set of tools and connectors to support all sorts of data systems and their corresponding metadata.

This, then, becomes the foundation for building a metadata knowledge graph.

---

---

How do future-forward data and AI teams use Atlan to build their enterprise metadata knowledge graph?

Permalink to “How do future-forward data and AI teams use Atlan to build their enterprise metadata knowledge graph?” #

With a unified metadata control plane, a standardized metadata schema, a broad range of connectors, and context built into every data asset, Atlan has all the ingredients to help you build a metadata knowledge graph.

In fact, you don’t actually need to “build” it. Once you configure your metadata sources, Atlan does that for you, and you get the following host of features:

• A unified control plane built on open standards that consolidates metadata from all your data systems.
• Semantic and ontological search and discovery, in addition to traditional keyword and full-text methods.
• Automated governance with tagging, classification, and propagation to enrich assets with context.
• A complete knowledge graph with provenance, lineage, dependencies, quality, and governance.
• Endless extensibility to support the user experience to be customized to their business domain.

What makes Atlan different is the unified control plane and how it enables metadata to be used for building a metadata knowledge graph, which, in turn, can be used for search, discovery, quality, and automation.

Let’s see how some of Atlan’s customers have been using these features to improve their experience working with data.

---

Real stories from real customers

Permalink to “Real stories from real customers” #

---

Moving forward with an enterprise-wide metadata knowledge graph to activate AI use cases

Permalink to “Moving forward with an enterprise-wide metadata knowledge graph to activate AI use cases” #

A metadata knowledge graph brings together fragmented, siloed, scattered, and often unaccounted-for metadata, and then turns it into a powerhouse of information which leads to the enablement of some use cases like data discovery, lineage, governance, and quality.

Without a metadata knowledge graph, metadata remains scattered and disconnected. With one, organizations gain a shared context layer that captures how data is related, governed, and actually used.

The biggest barrier to building this context is the lack of a strong metadata foundation. Many organizations already generate rich metadata, but it remains locked inside individual tools and domains.

Atlan addresses this by activating the metadata you already have, first by bringing it into a unified control plane and making it discoverable, and then by using it to power higher-order use cases like governance, quality, and AI readiness.

To find out more about Atlan’s built-in metadata knowledge graph and how it can help your organization with enterprise-scale AI use cases, book a personalized demo.

---

FAQs about metadata knowledge graph

Permalink to “FAQs about metadata knowledge graph” #

1. What is a metadata knowledge graph?

Permalink to “1. What is a metadata knowledge graph?” #

A metadata knowledge graph is a meaningful way of understanding how all data within an organization across various systems and processes is connected. It needs to be built upon a solid foundation of metadata, something that, for most organizations, is hard to achieve without a metadata control plane in place.

2. What is the difference between a metadata knowledge graph and an ontology?

Permalink to “2. What is the difference between a metadata knowledge graph and an ontology?” #

Ontology is more about establishing the vocabulary or a technical and data-related organizational language to define what types of data assets and processes exist and how they relate to each other.

A metadata knowledge graph, on the other hand, is a realization of the ontology with real metadata while also being modelled to mimic a graph for better traversal and relationship definition, among other things.

3. What types of metadata are part of a metadata knowledge graph?

Permalink to “3. What types of metadata are part of a metadata knowledge graph?” #

A metadata knowledge graph captures all possible types of metadata within an organization’s data systems. This metadata could be technical, business-related, operational, or even usage metrics data. All of this combined forms a full picture of what any given data asset is about, how it relates to other data assets, how it should be used, and who has access to it.

4. Is a metadata knowledge graph the same as a data catalog?

Permalink to “4. Is a metadata knowledge graph the same as a data catalog?” #

Not really. A data catalog helps you search and discover data assets. A metadata knowledge graph does that bit too, but it also does much more than that. A metadata knowledge graph helps you traverse the links and associations between data assets, perform semantic search, and analyze the impact of changes, among other things. A data catalog without the superpowers of a metadata knowledge graph is definitely valuable, but in a very limited way.

5. Do you need a graph database for a metadata knowledge graph?

Permalink to “5. Do you need a graph database for a metadata knowledge graph?” #

Not necessarily. A context graph should ideally be stored in a graph database, just for the ease of modelling, but there are plenty of examples where you can achieve the same result by adopting graph database-like modelling in a relational database like PostgreSQL or MySQL. Some open-source data cataloging tools also use tools like Elasticsearch for this purpose.

---